Dance Open 2019: Nutcracker, choreography: Alexey Miroshnichenko performed by Perm Ballet
Anna Gordeeva specially for Dance Open
Tchaikovsky: involuntary assumption of power
It was 1876. Marius Petipa has been staging his ballets in Russia for thirty years — Don Quixote, The Pharaoh's Daughter and The Corsair have been already introduced to the public. The master works with Caesar Puni and Ludwig Minkus, energetic composers and professionals, treating all the tricks of dancers with indulgence: if a ballerina asks a choreographer to move a music fragment from the one act to another, no one author is surprised. Music — is a true servant of the ballet. A beautiful, smart servant, but still servant, knowing its place. The Grand music and the ballet are like parallel lines - they don’t intersect.
By this time, Tchaikovsky is already famous composer, now we could name him «a rising star» (his first three symphonies have already become well-known in Russia, it was a few years before the Eugene Onegin). And the Direction of Imperial Theatres, or rather its Moscow division, asked Tchaikovsky for a ballet — and the composer agreed. In part, because he was curious about experimenting in a new genre, and in part, because of the financial problems he had and the large honorarium he was promised (800 rub.). And in 1877, from the world premiere of Tchaikovsky's iconic ballet «Swan Lake», the new history of Russian ballet begins.
But then, in 1877, not everyone has realized it. The music, that will capture the audience and turn even the most conservative music lovers into balletomanes, was composed by the genius and designed for the talented choreographer — and Vaclav Reisinger running the Bolshoi ballet at that time really wasn’t such a genius. And the first production of the Swan Lake (where the orchestra had only two rehearsals for getting to know the musical score, that horrified Tchaikovsky) was lost in the ballet history, though it went through almost 30 spectacles. The «real» premiere, the spectacle of Marius Petipa and Lev Ivanov, was staged in the Mariinsky theatre in 1895 — after the death of the composer. Unfortunately, from his three ballet works (Swan Lake, The Sleeping Beauty and The Nutcracker) Tchaikovsky had a chance to see only last two.
And this selection of three spectacles, appeared in the last decade of 19th century, became the revolution in the ballet music. Tchaikovsky, the most peaceful and not ambitious for power person from all the composer generation, captured the imagination of all ballet masters and ballet audience.
The servants — it’s great and comfortable (especially in English serials), but everyone wants to have an equal interlocutor, and it was Tchaikovsky who became this interlocutor for those who dance and watch the ballet. And he still remains the same. In his musical «words» , containing deep meanings, every producer finds his own history. And expressed emotions — be it a secret sadness, a hope of first love, a pleasure of meeting — have a resonance with everyone’s heart. Meanwhile Tchaikovsky is never overly familiar with the listener, he never taps on his shoulder, never breathes down his neck trying to tell what he has eaten for breakfast — as it often happens with the modern authors. He is very sincere — but never tiresome. And in our times when the audience is attacked with televisionally staged and intensified emotions, to have such a friend in the music world — is happiness.
Read more: Tchaikovsky: involuntary assumption of power
Dance Open 2019: Nutcracker, choreography: Alexey Miroshnichenko performed by The Perm Ballet
Anna Gordeeva specially for Dance Open
«Nutcracker»: flowers instead of sweets
The ballet which we often consider a childish and sweet fairytale — is one of the last compositions of Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky. It has much sorrow and even fear — sorrow for disappointed hopes of the youth, fear of the inevitable ending of life. They are masked, disguised as a snowy lyric, adorned with the sparkles of happy memories. But the further the humanity goes from the premiere of 1892 (which was produced by Lev Ivanov, as Marius Petipa was sick), more attentively the musicians and ballet masters listen to the music and more bitter become the spectacles. And if in the interpretation of Maurice Béjart, having turned The Nutcracker into autobiography, into a story about himself as a little boy, feeling bad about the death of his mother and complicated relationships with his father, the final is still happy (finally, the boy has grown up and become a great ballet master in real life), then in the interpretation of Matthew Bourne the children live in an orphanage, and in Radu Poklitaru’s version the heroine is a small poor girl who freezes in the street in a holiday’s evening and it’s only the old rat which is trying to protect her from the frost (all the happy story about the prince appears only in her last dream). Each choreographer, which is going to stage The Nutcracker in our days, remembers about his colleagues’ works and decides for himself, to what degree he will consider this unchildish intonation of the composer and for whom he creates this spectacle — for adults or children.
The principal ballet master of the Perm Tchaikovsky Opera and Ballet Theatre, Alexey Miroshnichenko in his version of Nutcracker has decided to make the spectacle for himself — for the child, that he was in the Vaganova Ballet Academy. The grey thoughts of Tchaikovsky didn’t disappear, but they merged into the background. And in the spotlight has appeared…Saint Petersburg of 1892. Appeared its cathedrals and fences, canals and rinks where the girls so cheerfully flirt with dignified men. (Fallen in love with Saint-Petersburg in childhood, the stage designer Aliona Pikalova created tender decorations with the pictures of the Voronikhin’s fence, and Tatiana Noginova designed such beautiful costumes that Alexandre Benois would give her a compliment).
It’s Saint-Petersburg where the Stahlbaum family lives, where children and adults create their home theatre, tell the fairytale about the princess Pirlipat and where the girl Marie dreams about the meeting with the Nutcracker Prince. (The producer has decided not to follow «the historical truth», though in the 19th century the girl was named Clara, and she was renamed only with the beginning of the First World War, because the story became firmly Russian and nobody wanted to return it to German).
Miroshnichenko clearly remembers the best «childish» version of the ballet created by Vasili Vainonen (the version that the pupils of the Vaganova Ballet Academy usually dance and the version that he danced himself when he was a pupil) and respectfully bows to it, but still creates his own independent spectacle. And also he creates the most famous libretto change — the characters arrive not in Confiturenburg, but in Blumenberg. Not in a town of sweets, but in a town of flowers — and the divertissement is organized the same way, where not the sweets dance, but the roses, lilies, peonies and lotus. And the final in Miroshnichenko’s ballet is his own, personal — quite happy, though before this final the choreographer makes the spectator a little bit afraid. But what fairytale dispenses with the moment when you become afraid for the characters? Thus, the choreographer bows to the Tchaikovsky melancholy, but still confirms that everything will be fine.
Read more: “Nutcracker”: flowers instead of sweets